References for Design Our Climate


  1. IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324. See table AII.2.1c in Annex II.
  2. IPCC, 2019: Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Summary for Policymakers
  3. IPCC, 2019: Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Chapter 4: Land Degradation, p. 38.
  4. IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
  5. The Princeton University Carbon Mitigation Initiative (CMI). Accessed June 2018.
  6. Boden, T.A., Marland, G., and Andres, R.J. 2017. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. Accessed May 2018.
  7. The United Nations DESA/ Population Division, World Population Prospects 2017.
  8. The World Bank Databank. Accessed June 2018.
  9. Moomaw, W., P. Burgherr, G. Heath, M. Lenzen, J. Nyboer, A. Verbruggen, 2011: Annex II: Methodology. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Accessed June 2018.
  10. P Lako; Coal-fired power technologies: Coal-fired power options on the brink of climate policies. Energieonderzoek Centrum Nederland, October 2004.
  11. The International Energy Agency Technology Roadmaps. Various authors; accessed June 2018.
  12. The International Energy Agency, Tracking Clean Energy Progress: Cooling. Chiara Delmastro, et al. accessed October 2019.
  13. Leung, D. Y. C.; Caramanna, G.; Maroto-Valer, M. M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 39, p 426-443.
  14. Vattenfall website, Horns Rev 1. Acessed June 2018.
  15. Natural Renewable Energy Laboratory, Best Research-cell Efficiencies. Acessed June 2018.
  16. Rosner, R.; Hearn, A. What role could nuclear power play in limiting climate change?, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2017, 73:1, 2-6.
  17. Sathaye, J., O. Lucon, A. Rahman, J. Christensen, F. Denton, J. Fujino, G. Heath, S. Kadner, M. Mirza, H. Rudnick, A. Schlaepfer, A. Shmakin, 2011: Renewable Energy in the Context of Sustainable Development. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation [O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
  18. Natural Resources Canada, 2008 Canadian Vehicle Survey (updated 2010).
  19. Hill, J.; Nelson, E.; Tilman, D.; Polasky, S.; Tiffany, D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. PNAS, 2006, 103, p 11206–11210.
  20. The US Department of Energy Annual Energy Outlook 2018, with projections to 2050.
  21. Owen, N.A.; Griffiths, H. Marginal land bioethanol yield potential of four crassulacean acid metabolism candidates (Agave fourcroydes, Agave salmiana, Agave tequilana and Opuntia ficus-indica) in Australia. GCB Bioenergy (2014) 6, 687–703.
  22. The US Energy Information Administration, Use of Energy in the united States Explained. Accessed June 2018.
  23. Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Gong, X.; Guo, Z. The intensification technologies to water electrolysis for hydrogen production – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 29, p. 573–588.
  24. US Department of Energy Office of Efficiency & Renewable Energy: “Compare Fuel Cell Vehicles”. Accessed June 2018.
  25. Rau, G.H.; Willauer, H.D.; Ren, Z.J. The global potential for converting renewable electricity to negative-CO2-emissions hydrogen. Nature Climate Change, 2018.
  26. US Department of Energy Alternative Fuels Data Center, Alternative Fuel and Advanced Vehicle Search. Accessed June 2018
  27. FAOstat: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division. Accessed June 2018.
  28. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Zero-Deforestation Commitments, 2018.
  29. Busari, M. A.; Kukal, S. S.; Kaur, A.; Bhatt, R.; Dulazi, A. A.; Conservation tillage impacts on soil, crop and the environment. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 2015, 3, p 119–129.
  30. Tebrügge, F.; Epperlein, J. The Importance Of The Conservation Agriculture Within The Framework Of The Climate Discussion (position paper presented to Members of the European Conservation Agriculture Federation). Accessed June 2018.
  31. Global Alliance for Building and Construction, Towards zero-emission efficient and resilient buildings. Global Status Report 2016.
  32. Pons, O.; Wadel, G. Environmental impacts of prefabricated school buildings in Catalonia. Habitat International 2011, 35, p. 553-563.
  33. Aye, L.; Ngo, T.; Crawford, R.H.; Gammampila, R.; Mendis, P. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules. Energy and Buildings 2012, 47, p.159–168.
  34. The US Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Life-Cycle Assessment of Energy and Environmental Impacts of LED Lighting Products. 2012.
  35. Statista; Estimated LED penetration of the global lighting market from 2010 to 2020. Accessed June 2019.
  36. The Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 36.1—2018. Accessed June 4, 2019.
  37. International Energy Association, World Energy Outlook, 2018. Accessed July 10, 2019
  38. National Petroleum Council, Advancing Technology for America's Transportation, 2012. Accessed July 10, 2019.
  39. U.S Energy Information Administration, Independent Statistics and Analysis. Accessed July 10, 2019.
  40. U.S Energy Information Administration, Independent Statistics and Analysis. Accessed July 10, 2019.
  41. Legesse, G. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions of Canadian beef production in 1981 as compared with 2011. Animal Production Science 56(3) 153-168 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15386
  42. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
  43. NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division. Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide.
  44. Biello, David. Climate Numerology: How Much Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Is Safe? Scientific American, 2010.
  45. IPCC, 2018: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, T. Waterfield (eds.)].
  46. NOAA Arctic Report Card, 2018.
  47. Parris, A., P. Bromirski, V. Burkett, D. Cayan, M. Culver, J. Hall, R. Horton, K. Knuuti, R. Moss, J. Obeysekera, A. Sallenger, and J. Weiss. 2012. Global Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the US National Climate Assessment. NOAA Tech Memo OAR CPO-1, p.14.
  48. Caldeira, K, and Wickett, M. Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature. 425, 365 (2003).
  49. Ocean Acidification. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  50. Bozlee, B. J.; Janebo, M. (2008). A Simplified Model To Predicate the Effect of Increasing Atmospheric CO2 on Carbonate Chemistry in the Ocean. J. Chem. Ed., 85 (2), 213-217.
  51. Lindsey, R. Climate Change: Global Sea Level. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2018.
  52. World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Report 2019; 14th Edition
  53. IATA Fact Sheet, June 2019
  54. Graver, Brandon, and Rutherford, Daniel. Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking. The International Council of Clean Transportation, September 2018.
  55. Global Alliance for Building and Construction, Towards zero-emission efficient and resilient buildings. Global Status Report 2017.
  56. Ibn-Mohammed, T.; Greenough, R.; Taylor, S.; Ozawa-Meida, L.; Acquaya, A. Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings--A review of current trends. Energy and Buildings 2013, 66, p.232-245.
  57. Daigo, I.; Iwata, K.; Oguchi, M.; Goto, Y. Lifetime Distribution of Buildings Decided by Economic Situation at Demolition: D-based Lifetime Distribution. Procedia CIRP 2017, 61, p.146-151.
  58. Whole Building Design Guide, "Biomass For Heat." Accessed July 2019.
  59. U.S. Energy Information Administration: Independent Statistics & Analysis, "Biomass Explained: Wood and Wood Waste." Accessed July 2019.
  60. Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, "Natural Gas." Accessed July 2019.
  61. U.S. Energy Information Administration: Independent Statistics & Analysis, "Biomass Explained: Biomass and the Environment." Accessed July 2019.
  62. International Energy Agency, "Energy Efficiency: Buildings, The global exchange for energy efficiency policies, data and impacts." Accessed July 2019.
  63. International Energy Agency, "Energy Efficiency: Cooling, The global exchange for energy efficiency policies, data and impacts." Accessed July 2019.
  64. Crowther, Thomas J. et al. Predicting Global Forest Reforestation Potential. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2017.
  65. Cunningham, S.C. et al. Balancing the environmental benefits of reforestation in agricultural regions. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 17, 2015, p. 301-317.
  66. Facts and Details, Reforestation, Combating Deforestation. Accessed July 2019.
  67. Drawdown, Materials: Water Saving - Home. Accessed June 2020.
  68. Drawdown, Transport: Ships. Accessed July 2019.
  69. Drawdown, Transport: Airplanes. Accessed July 2019.
  70. CN, Carbon Calculator Emission Factors. Accessed July 2019.
  71. European Chemical Transport Association, Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 Emission from Freight Transport Operations, Issue 1, March 2011.
  72. Railway Association of Canada, Locomotive Emissions Monitoring, Accessed July 2019.
  73. C. Walsh, and A. Bows. Incorporating Lifestyle Elements into the Energy Efficiency Design Index. Sustainable Consumption Institute, 2011.
  74. Howitt, Oliver J.A., et al. Carbon dioxide emissions from international air freight. Atmospheric Environment, Vol 45, Issue 39, 2011.
  75. Time For Change, CO2 emissions for shipping of goods, Accessed July 2019.
  76. International Energy Agency, Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry. Technology Roadmap 2018.
  77. Drawdown, Materials: Alternative Cement, Accessed June 2020.
  78. Drawdown, Transport: Trains, Accessed July 2019.
  79. Drawdown, Transport: Trucks, Accessed July 2019.
  80. International Transport Forum, ITF Transport Outlook 2017, p.39.
  81. Kerimray, A; et al. Coal use for residential heating: Patterns, health implications and lessons learned. Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol 40, 2017, p. 19-30.
  82. IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
  83. Brack, Duncan; Andersen, Stephen O.; and Sun, Xiaopu. National Hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) Inventories: A summary of the key findings from the first tranche of studies. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Environment Programme, Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC), 2016.
  84. Drawdown, Materials: Refrigerant Management, Accessed July 2019.
  85. United Nations Environment Programme. Available Information on HFC Consumption and Production in Article 5 Countries, March 2017.
  86. Velders, Guus J. M., et al. The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, June 2009.
  87. Icons made by iconixar from www.flaticon.com messages.attribution.is_licensed_by CC 3.0 BY
    Icons made by Eucalyp from www.flaticon.com messages.attribution.is_licensed_by CC 3.0 BY
    Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com messages.attribution.is_licensed_by CC 3.0 BY
    Icons made by ultimatearm from www.flaticon.com messages.attribution.is_licensed_by CC 3.0 BY
  88. Bogdanov, D. et al. Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps. Nature Communications 2019, 10, 1077.
  89. BP, Electricity: General . Accessed July 2019.
  90. Drawdown, Electricity: Nuclear. Accessed July 2019.
  91. Drawdown, Electricity: Geothermal. Accessed July 2019.
  92. Drawdown, Electricity: Hydroelectricity. Accessed July 2019.
  93. Drawdown, Electricity: Nuclear. Accessed July 2019.
  94. Drawdown, Women and Girls. Accessed August 2019.
  95. Heath, G. et al. Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation. PNAS 2014, 111, E3167-E3176.
  96. Kumar, A. et al. 2011: Hydropower. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation [O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
  97. IRENA (2018), Global Energy Transformation: A roadmap to 2050, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi.
  98. Morrison, L. et al. Morrison, M. L.; Sinclair, K. Wind Energy Technology, Environmental Impacts of. Encyclopedia of Energy 2004, 435-448.
  99. Literature Review and Sensitivity Analysis of Biopower Life-Cycle Assessments and Greenhouse Gas Emission. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2013. 1026852.
  100. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Prospects 2019, Online Addition.
  101. Warner, E. et al. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nuclear Electricity Generation. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2012, 16, S73-S92.
  102. World Energy Council, Electricity: Nuclear. Accessed July 2019.
  103. Life Cycle GHG Emissions of Coal-Fired Electricity Generation; Whitaker et al. Accessed July 2019.
  104. International Energy Agency. Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage, 2013.
  105. Mac Dowell, Niall; Fennell, Paul S., Shah, Nilay; and Maitland, Geoffrey C. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nature: Climate Change, April 5, 2017.
  106. IPCC Special Report, Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Summary for Policy Makers, September 2005.
  107. UNFCC Paris Agreement, 2015.
  108. The OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2012.
    div>
  109. The US Department of Energy Alternative Fuel Data Center, Propane Vehicle Emissions. Accessed October 2019.
  110. Woo, J.R., Choi, H., Ahn, J., 2017. Well-to-wheel analysis of greenhouse gas emissions for electric vehicles based on electricity generation mix: a global perspective. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 51, 340–350.
  111. Masnadi, M.S., El-Houjeiri, H.M., Schunack, D., Li, Y., Englander, J.G., et al. Science 2018, 361, 6405, 851-853. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar6859
  112. IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, Topic 2: Future Climate Changes, Risks, and Impacts.
  113. Clark, W. C. (ed.). 1982. Carbon Dioxide Review: 1982, p. 467, Oxford University Press, New York.
  114. Russell, R., Gardiner, L. The Very, Very Simple Climate Model, Accessed October 2019.
  115. McCay, AT, Feliks, MEJ, Roberts, JJ. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 685, 208-219.
  116. Forest Research, Carbon Emissions of Different Fuels, accessed December 2019.
  117. Gaffney, O, Steffen, W The Anthropocene Review 2017, 4, 53-61.
  118. Riahi, K., Rao, S., Krey, V. et al. Climatic Change 2011, 109, 33.
  119. Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D.P., Kriegler, E. et al. Global Environmental Change 2017, 42, 153.
  120. International Transport Forum. ITF Transport Outlook 2019. OECD Publishing, 2019, p.36.
  121. Drawdown, Solutions: Alternative Refrigerants, Accessed June 2020.
  122. Drawdown, Solutions: LED-Lighting, Accessed June 2020.
  123. International Energy Agency, Global Status Report 2017. Accessed June 2020.
  124. Drawdown, Sector Summary: Buildings, Accessed June 2020.
  125. World Green Building Council, Bring embodied carbon upfront: Coordinated action for the building and construction sector to tackle embodied carbon, 2019. Accessed June 2020.
  126. Huang, Lizhen & Krigsvoll, Guri & Johansen, Fred & Liu, Yongping & Zhang, Xiaoling. (2017). Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.001.
  127. Architecture 2030, NEW BUILDINGS: EMBODIED CARBON, 2019. Accessed June 2020.
  128. Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana & Koeppel, Sonja & Mirasgedis, Sebastian. (2007). Appraisal of policy instruments for reducing buildings' CO2 emissions. Building Research and Information - BUILDING RES INFORM. 35. 458-477. 10.1080/09613210701327384.
  129. Energy Technology Perspectives 2012: Pathways to a Clean Energy System. International Energy Agency, p.178.
  130. Global Alliance for Building and Construction, Towards zero-emission efficient and resilient buildings. Global Status Report 2018.
  131. Drawdown, Solutions: High-Efficiency Heat Pumps. Accessed June 2020.
  132. Drawdown, Solutions: Solar Hot Water. Accessed July 2020.
  133. FAO and UNEP. 2020. The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome.
  134. Center for Global Development. 2015. The Future of Forests: Emissions from Tropical Deforestation with and without a Carbon Price, 2016–2050.
  135. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2005, Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 Progress towards sustainable forest management. Accessed July 2020.
  136. Bastin, Jean-François & Finegold, Yelena & Garcia, Claude & Mollicone, Danilo & Rezende, Marcelo & Routh, Devin & Zohner, Constantin & Crowther, Thomas. (2019). The global tree restoration potential. Science. 365. 76-79. 10.1126/science.aax0848.
  137. Drawdown, Solutions: Conservation Agriculture. Accessed July 2020.
  138. Leahy S., Clark H., Reisinger A., Challenges and Prospects for Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Pathways Consistent With the Paris Agreement. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 22 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00069.
  139. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food wastage footprint & Climate Change. Accessed July 2020.
  140. Drawdown, Solutions: Reduced Food Waste. Accessed July 2020.
  141. Drawdown, Solutions: Forest Protection. Accessed July 2020.
  142. Harris, N. et al. When a Tree Falls, Is It Deforestation? World Resources Institute, 2018. Accessed July 2020.
  143. Drawdown, Solutions: District Heating. Accessed July 2020.
  144. Drawdown, Solutions: Plant-Rich Diets, Accessed July 2020.
  145. Drawdown, Solutions: Peatland Protection and Rewetting, Accessed July 2020.
  146. Drawdown, Solutions: Improved Clean Cookstoves, Accessed July 2020.
  147. Drawdown, Solutions: Tropical Forest Restoration, Accessed July 2020.
  148. The ICCT: Transportation Roadmap. Roadmap Model Baseline Results (August 2017). Accessed June 2020.
  149. International ransport Forum: Transport demand set to triple, but sector faces potential disruptions. Accessed June 2020.
  150. Drawdown, Transportation: Bicycle Infrastructure, Accessed June 2020.
  151. Drawdown, Transportation: Walkable Cities, Accessed June 2020.
  152. Drawdown, Transportation: Public Transit, Accessed June 2020.
  153. Drawdown, Transportation: Carpooling, Accessed June 2020.
  154. IEA, Tracking Transport Report:2020. Accessed June 2020
  155. ICCT Global Fuel Economy Initiative for Zero Carbon Vehicles by 2020, Working Paper 20:PROSPECTS FOR FUEL EFFICIENCY, ELECTRIFICATION AND FLEET DECARBONISATION, . Accessed June 2020
  156. Natural Ressources Canada, Fuel Consumption Report: 2020 Toyota Prius. Accessed June 2020
  157. Boston Consulting Group, The Electric Car Tipping Point: The Future of Powertrains for Owned and Shared Mobility. Accessed June 2020.
  158. BloombergNEF, Electric Vehicle Outlook 2020. Accessed June 2020.
  159. EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2020. Accessed June 2020.
  160. Equinor, Energy Perspectives 2019. Accessed June 2020.
  161. SHELL HYDROGEN STUDY ENERGY OF THE FUTURE? Sustainable Mobility through Fuel Cells and H2. Accessed June 2020.
  162. WLPGA, A GLOBAL ROADMAP FOR AUTOGAS. Accessed June 2020.
  163. Christine Negroni, How Much of the World’s Population Has Flown in an Airplane?. Air and Space Magazine, Published January 6, 2016. Accessed June 2020.
  164. Dan Rutherford, Size matters for aircraft fuel efficiency. Just not in the way that you think.ICCT Blog, Published February 27, 2018. Accessed June 2020.
  165. Drawdown, Transportation:Efficient Aviation, Accessed June 2020.
  166. Gütschow, J.; Jeffery, L.; Gieseke, R., Günther, A. (2019): The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series (1850-2017). v2.1. GFZ Data Services. Accessed July 2020
  167. Natural Resources Canada. 2020 Fuel Consumption Guide. Accessed July 2020
  168. Global CCS Institute. Global Status of CCS 2019. Accessed July 2020.
  169. Pembina Institite. CCS Potential in the Oil Sands, 2014. Accessed July 2020
  170. Skeptical Science. Comparing CO2 emissions to CO2 levels. Accessed July 2020
  171. Argonne National Laboratory. GREET Life Cycle Model. Accessed July 2020
  172. Cordero EC, Centeno D, Todd AM (2020) The role of climate change education on individual lifetime carbon emissions. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0206266.

© The King's Centre for Visualization in Science. Content subject to KCVS terms of use.